During World War II, Germany's military played a pivotal role in shaping the course of history. Known for its strategic prowess and technological advancements, the German army was a formidable force. But what did Germany call their army during WW2? Understanding the nomenclature and structure of Germany's military forces provides crucial insights into its operations and strategies during the war. The name was not just a label; it represented the might and ideology of the era. This article will delve into the historical context, organizational structure, and the legacy of Germany's WWII army.
At the heart of Germany's military operations during World War II was the "Wehrmacht," the unified armed forces of Nazi Germany from 1935 to 1945. Comprised of the Heer (army), Kriegsmarine (navy), and Luftwaffe (air force), the Wehrmacht was instrumental in executing Germany's war strategies. The term "Wehrmacht" translates to "defense force," reflecting Adolf Hitler's initial portrayal of the military as a defensive organization, despite its aggressive undertakings. The Wehrmacht's actions, decisions, and organization had a lasting impact on military tactics and international relations.
Understanding the intricacies of the Wehrmacht helps us comprehend Germany's military strategies and the broader implications of its actions during the war. From its formation to its eventual dissolution, the Wehrmacht was central to Germany's war efforts. This article will explore the army's structure, key figures, and the significant events that defined its legacy. By analyzing these elements, we gain a comprehensive understanding of how the Wehrmacht shaped the course of World War II and its lasting influence on military history.
Read also:Is Tom Macdonald Racist Unraveling The Truth Behind The Controversy
The Wehrmacht's origins can be traced back to post-World War I Germany, a period marked by political instability and economic hardship. Following the Treaty of Versailles, Germany's military capabilities were severely restricted. The treaty limited the size of the army to 100,000 men and prohibited the possession of heavy artillery, tanks, and an air force. However, as the Weimar Republic struggled, nationalist sentiments grew, eventually leading to Adolf Hitler's rise to power in 1933. The establishment of the Wehrmacht in 1935 marked the beginning of a significant military expansion under Nazi rule.
The term "Wehrmacht" itself was introduced as part of Hitler's efforts to create an all-encompassing military force that could effectively implement his aggressive foreign policy. This force replaced the Reichswehr, the interwar German army, and signaled a shift towards rearmament and militarization. The Wehrmacht was not only a military body but also a tool for promoting Nazi ideology and consolidating Hitler's power. Its creation marked a turning point in Germany's military history, laying the groundwork for its involvement in World War II.
By 1939, the Wehrmacht had grown into a formidable force, boasting advanced technology and a well-trained fighting force. The rearmament process, which began in secret, was made possible through extensive propaganda, industrial mobilization, and the exploitation of resources from occupied territories. The Wehrmacht's development was a testament to Nazi Germany's ambitions for territorial expansion and dominance in Europe, setting the stage for the conflict that would engulf the world.
The formation of the Wehrmacht was a strategic maneuver orchestrated by Adolf Hitler and his regime to circumvent the restrictions imposed by the Treaty of Versailles. In 1933, shortly after coming to power, Hitler began laying the groundwork for the Wehrmacht's establishment. The process involved a series of covert operations, political manipulations, and strategic alliances to rebuild Germany's military strength.
This rearmament effort was initiated under the guise of civilian programs and international diplomacy, allowing Germany to secretly expand its military capabilities. Key to this process was the establishment of the Luftwaffe, Germany's air force, which was initially camouflaged as civilian aviation clubs. The navy, or Kriegsmarine, was also expanded under the pretense of commercial shipping activities.
In 1935, the official declaration of the Wehrmacht marked a significant milestone in Nazi Germany's military ambitions. The announcement was accompanied by the reinstatement of conscription, which facilitated the rapid expansion of the army. The Wehrmacht was structured to include three main branches: the Heer (army), the Kriegsmarine (navy), and the Luftwaffe (air force). This tripartite organization allowed for a comprehensive approach to warfare, integrating land, sea, and air operations under a unified command.
Read also:Palantir Technologies Transforming The Future Of Data Analytics And Decisionmaking
The formation of the Wehrmacht was not just a military endeavor but also a political statement. It symbolized Germany's defiance of the Versailles Treaty and its intention to reassert itself as a dominant power on the global stage. The Wehrmacht's creation was a pivotal step in Hitler's plan for territorial expansion and the establishment of a new world order based on Nazi ideology.
The Wehrmacht was structured to maximize its operational efficiency and adaptability across various combat scenarios. Its organization reflected a modern approach to warfare, emphasizing coordination between its three main branches: the Heer, Kriegsmarine, and Luftwaffe. Each branch had distinct roles and responsibilities, yet they worked in tandem to achieve strategic objectives.
The Heer, or army, was the largest component of the Wehrmacht, responsible for land-based military operations. It was organized into divisions, each consisting of infantry, artillery, and armored units. The Heer was pivotal in executing blitzkrieg tactics, a strategy that focused on rapid, coordinated attacks to overwhelm enemy forces.
The Kriegsmarine, Germany's navy, played a crucial role in securing naval dominance and disrupting Allied supply lines. It operated a fleet of battleships, submarines, and aircraft carriers, with the U-boat fleet being particularly effective in waging unrestricted submarine warfare. The Kriegsmarine's strategic importance was evident in its efforts to control key maritime routes and support land operations through amphibious assaults.
The Luftwaffe, the air force, was instrumental in providing air superiority and supporting ground operations. It was equipped with advanced aircraft, including fighters, bombers, and reconnaissance planes. The Luftwaffe's ability to conduct aerial bombing campaigns and provide close air support to ground troops was a critical factor in the Wehrmacht's success during the early years of the war.
The overall structure of the Wehrmacht was characterized by a high degree of centralization and hierarchical command. The Oberkommando der Wehrmacht (OKW), or High Command of the Armed Forces, was responsible for strategic planning and coordination across all branches. This centralized command structure allowed for efficient decision-making and resource allocation, contributing to the Wehrmacht's initial successes in the war.
The Wehrmacht played several crucial roles during World War II, shaping the course of the conflict through its strategic operations and military engagements. Its actions were pivotal in the early successes of Nazi Germany and had far-reaching implications for the war's progression.
One of the primary roles of the Wehrmacht was the implementation of blitzkrieg tactics, which revolutionized modern warfare. This strategy involved rapid, coordinated attacks that combined air strikes, artillery bombardments, and fast-moving ground troops to quickly penetrate enemy defenses. The Wehrmacht's use of blitzkrieg was evident in its swift victories in Poland, France, and the Low Countries, where it achieved significant territorial gains.
The Wehrmacht was also responsible for the invasion and occupation of multiple European countries, extending Germany's influence across the continent. Its operations in the Balkans, Scandinavia, and the Eastern Front demonstrated its ability to conduct large-scale campaigns across diverse terrains and climates. The Wehrmacht's involvement in the Battle of Stalingrad and the Siege of Leningrad were particularly significant, highlighting its strategic importance in the Eastern Front's brutal and protracted conflict.
In addition to its combat roles, the Wehrmacht played a part in the administration and exploitation of occupied territories. It was involved in the establishment of military governments, the extraction of resources, and the implementation of policies aligned with Nazi ideology. The Wehrmacht's presence in occupied regions facilitated the enforcement of German control and the suppression of resistance movements.
The Wehrmacht's role in World War II extended beyond conventional military engagements. It was also implicated in war crimes and atrocities committed against civilians, particularly in Eastern Europe. The involvement of Wehrmacht personnel in these actions remains a contentious and controversial aspect of its legacy, raising ethical questions about the conduct of war and the responsibilities of military forces.
The Wehrmacht's operations and strategies were shaped by several key figures who held significant influence over its actions during World War II. These individuals were instrumental in directing military campaigns, making strategic decisions, and shaping the Wehrmacht's legacy.
One of the most prominent figures was Wilhelm Keitel, who served as the Chief of the Oberkommando der Wehrmacht (OKW). Keitel was a close confidant of Adolf Hitler and played a central role in coordinating the Wehrmacht's activities across its various branches. His position allowed him to oversee strategic planning and execution, although his reputation was marred by his involvement in implementing Nazi policies and war crimes.
Another important figure was Erwin Rommel, also known as the "Desert Fox." Rommel gained fame for his leadership of the Afrika Korps in North Africa, where he demonstrated exceptional tactical acumen and innovation. His campaigns in the desert were marked by daring maneuvers and strategic brilliance, earning him respect from both allies and adversaries. Rommel's legacy is complex, as he later became involved in the plot to assassinate Hitler, reflecting his disillusionment with the Nazi regime.
Heinz Guderian was another influential commander known for his contributions to the development of blitzkrieg tactics. As a pioneer of armored warfare, Guderian advocated for the use of tanks and mechanized infantry to achieve rapid breakthroughs in enemy lines. His leadership during the invasions of Poland and France showcased the effectiveness of these tactics, cementing his reputation as a military innovator.
Albert Kesselring, a senior Luftwaffe officer, played a crucial role in the Wehrmacht's air operations. He was instrumental in planning and executing aerial campaigns, including the Battle of Britain and the defense of Italy against Allied advances. Kesselring's strategic vision and leadership in the Luftwaffe contributed to the Wehrmacht's air supremacy during the early years of the war.
These key figures, among others, were pivotal in shaping the Wehrmacht's operations and strategies during World War II. Their actions and decisions had a lasting impact on the course of the conflict and continue to be studied for their military and historical significance.
The Wehrmacht was involved in numerous major operations throughout World War II, each contributing to the overall strategy and objectives of Nazi Germany. These operations were characterized by their scale, complexity, and impact on the war's progression.
One of the earliest and most significant operations was the invasion of Poland in September 1939, which marked the beginning of World War II. The operation, known as Fall Weiss (Case White), involved a coordinated assault by the Heer, Luftwaffe, and Kriegsmarine, employing blitzkrieg tactics to achieve a swift victory. The successful invasion led to the partitioning of Poland between Germany and the Soviet Union, setting the stage for further territorial expansion.
Operation Barbarossa, launched in June 1941, was the largest military campaign in history and a turning point in the war. The Wehrmacht's invasion of the Soviet Union aimed to secure vast territories and resources while defeating the Red Army. Despite initial successes, the operation ultimately stalled due to logistical challenges, harsh weather conditions, and fierce Soviet resistance. The failure of Operation Barbarossa marked a significant setback for the Wehrmacht and shifted the tide of the war in favor of the Allies.
The Wehrmacht also played a central role in the Battle of France in 1940, where it executed a rapid and decisive campaign against French and Allied forces. The operation, known as Fall Gelb (Case Yellow), involved a surprise attack through the Ardennes forest, bypassing the heavily fortified Maginot Line. The swift victory in France demonstrated the effectiveness of blitzkrieg tactics and solidified Germany's dominance in Western Europe.
In North Africa, the Wehrmacht's Afrika Korps, led by Erwin Rommel, conducted several operations aimed at securing control of the region. The North African Campaign saw intense battles, including the Siege of Tobruk and the Battle of El Alamein, where the Wehrmacht faced off against British and Commonwealth forces. Despite initial successes, the campaign ultimately ended in defeat for the Wehrmacht, marking a turning point in the Mediterranean theater.
The Wehrmacht's involvement in these and other major operations had a profound impact on the course of World War II. Each operation reflected the strategic objectives and capabilities of the Wehrmacht, as well as the challenges and limitations it faced in executing its military ambitions.
The Wehrmacht was renowned for its technological advancements, which played a significant role in its military operations during World War II. These innovations reflected Germany's emphasis on modernizing its armed forces and enhancing its combat capabilities.
One of the most notable technological advancements was the development of armored warfare, particularly through the use of tanks. The Wehrmacht's Panzer divisions were equipped with advanced tanks, such as the Panzer III and Panzer IV, which were instrumental in executing blitzkrieg tactics. These tanks featured improved armor, firepower, and mobility, allowing the Wehrmacht to achieve rapid breakthroughs in enemy lines.
The Luftwaffe also benefited from technological innovations, with advancements in aircraft design and capabilities. The Messerschmitt Bf 109 and Focke-Wulf Fw 190 were among the most advanced fighter planes of the era, providing the Luftwaffe with air superiority. Additionally, the development of long-range bombers, such as the Heinkel He 111 and Junkers Ju 88, enabled the Wehrmacht to conduct strategic bombing campaigns against enemy targets.
Another significant technological development was the use of radio and communication systems, which facilitated coordination and command within the Wehrmacht. The integration of radio communication allowed for real-time information exchange and decision-making, enhancing the effectiveness of combined arms operations and blitzkrieg tactics.
The Wehrmacht also explored innovations in other areas, such as the use of rockets and guided missiles. The V-2 rocket, developed by Nazi Germany, was the world's first long-range guided ballistic missile and represented a significant technological breakthrough. Although deployed late in the war, it demonstrated the Wehrmacht's commitment to pushing the boundaries of military technology.
These technological advancements contributed to the Wehrmacht's initial successes in World War II, providing it with a tactical edge over its adversaries. However, as the war progressed, the Allies developed their own innovations and countermeasures, ultimately challenging the Wehrmacht's technological superiority.
The Wehrmacht's military tactics and strategies were characterized by their innovation, adaptability, and effectiveness in achieving strategic objectives during World War II. These approaches were instrumental in the Wehrmacht's initial successes and remain subjects of study in military history.
One of the most defining tactics of the Wehrmacht was the use of blitzkrieg, or "lightning war." This strategy involved rapid, coordinated attacks that combined air strikes, artillery bombardments, and mechanized ground forces to quickly penetrate and disrupt enemy defenses. The blitzkrieg approach emphasized speed, surprise, and flexibility, allowing the Wehrmacht to achieve decisive victories in Poland, France, and other campaigns.
The Wehrmacht also employed combined arms operations, integrating the capabilities of its various branches to achieve synergistic effects on the battlefield. This approach involved the close coordination of infantry, armor, artillery, and air support, enabling the Wehrmacht to exploit weaknesses in enemy defenses and maintain momentum in its offensives.
Defensive tactics were also a key component of the Wehrmacht's strategy, particularly as the war progressed and it faced increasing pressure from Allied forces. The Wehrmacht employed strategic withdrawals, fortified defenses, and counterattacks to delay and disrupt enemy advances. The use of prepared defensive positions, such as the Atlantic Wall and the Siegfried Line, exemplified the Wehrmacht's focus on defense-in-depth strategies.
In addition to these tactics, the Wehrmacht emphasized the importance of reconnaissance and intelligence in its operations. The use of reconnaissance units and aerial surveillance allowed the Wehrmacht to gather critical information about enemy movements and positions, informing its tactical decisions and enabling effective planning.
The Wehrmacht's military tactics and strategies were not without their limitations and challenges. As the war progressed, the Wehrmacht faced logistical constraints, resource shortages, and increasing resistance from Allied forces. These factors, combined with strategic miscalculations, ultimately contributed to the Wehrmacht's eventual defeat.
The Wehrmacht encountered numerous challenges during World War II, which impacted its operations and contributed to its eventual defeat. These challenges were multifaceted and stemmed from both external and internal factors.
One of the primary challenges was the logistical strain on the Wehrmacht's operations. The rapid expansion of Germany's territorial holdings required extensive supply lines and resource management to support its military campaigns. As the war progressed, the Wehrmacht struggled to maintain adequate supplies of fuel, ammunition, and food, particularly on the Eastern Front. The harsh winter conditions and vast distances exacerbated these logistical difficulties, hindering the Wehrmacht's ability to sustain its offensives.
Another significant challenge was the increasing resistance from Allied forces, which adapted to the Wehrmacht's tactics and developed effective countermeasures. The Allied powers leveraged their industrial capacity and technological innovations to produce advanced weaponry and equipment, challenging the Wehrmacht's initial technological superiority. The entry of the United States into the war further bolstered the Allies' military capabilities, leading to a shift in the balance of power.
The Wehrmacht also faced strategic challenges, particularly in coordinating operations across multiple fronts. The decision to invade the Soviet Union stretched the Wehrmacht's resources and attention, creating a two-front war that strained its capabilities. The prolonged and brutal conflict on the Eastern Front consumed significant manpower and resources, diverting attention from other theaters of war.
Internal challenges, including leadership issues and political interference, further complicated the Wehrmacht's operations. The centralized command structure under Adolf Hitler often led to strategic miscalculations and inflexible decision-making. Hitler's insistence on maintaining control over military decisions resulted in conflicts with senior commanders and hindered the Wehrmacht's ability to adapt to changing circumstances.
These challenges, along with the cumulative effects of sustained combat, ultimately contributed to the Wehrmacht's decline and defeat in World War II. Despite its initial successes, the Wehrmacht was unable to overcome the growing adversities and mounting pressure from Allied forces.
The Wehrmacht had a profound impact on World War II, shaping the course of the conflict through its military operations and strategic decisions. Its actions influenced the geopolitical landscape and had lasting implications for international relations and military history.
One of the most significant impacts of the Wehrmacht was its role in the early successes of Nazi Germany, which altered the balance of power in Europe. The Wehrmacht's rapid and decisive victories in Poland, France, and other countries demonstrated the effectiveness of blitzkrieg tactics and established Germany as a dominant force on the continent. These victories facilitated Germany's territorial expansion and control over key regions, setting the stage for further military ambitions.
The Wehrmacht's involvement in the invasion of the Soviet Union had far-reaching consequences for the war. Operation Barbarossa, although initially successful, ultimately failed to achieve its objectives and resulted in a prolonged and brutal conflict on the Eastern Front. The Wehrmacht's inability to secure a decisive victory against the Soviet Union marked a turning point in the war, leading to significant losses and weakening Germany's overall military position.
The Wehrmacht's actions also had a profound impact on civilian populations and occupied territories. Its involvement in the administration and exploitation of occupied regions contributed to the implementation of Nazi policies, including forced labor, resource extraction, and the persecution of minority groups. The Wehrmacht's complicity in war crimes and atrocities remains a contentious aspect of its legacy, raising ethical questions about the conduct of war.
In the broader context of military history, the Wehrmacht's tactics and strategies continue to be studied for their innovation and effectiveness. The use of blitzkrieg and combined arms operations influenced modern military doctrine and shaped the development of armored warfare. The Wehrmacht's emphasis on speed, coordination, and flexibility remains relevant in contemporary military planning and operations.
The impact of the Wehrmacht on World War II extends beyond its military actions, encompassing its contributions to the broader historical narrative and understanding of the conflict. Its legacy serves as a reminder of the complexities and challenges of warfare, as well as the ethical considerations that accompany military power and decision-making.
The legacy of the Wehrmacht is complex and multifaceted, encompassing its military achievements, ethical controversies, and contributions to the broader historical narrative of World War II. Its actions and decisions continue to be the subject of analysis and debate, reflecting the enduring impact of its legacy.
One aspect of the Wehrmacht's legacy is its influence on modern military tactics and doctrine. The innovations in blitzkrieg and combined arms operations demonstrated the effectiveness of rapid, coordinated attacks and the integration of different branches of the military. These tactics have been studied and adapted by contemporary armed forces, shaping the development of modern warfare and military strategy.
The Wehrmacht's technological advancements also contribute to its legacy, highlighting the importance of innovation and adaptability in military operations. The development of advanced tanks, aircraft, and communication systems provided the Wehrmacht with a tactical edge during the early years of World War II. These innovations laid the groundwork for future technological advancements in military hardware and tactics.
However, the Wehrmacht's legacy is also marked by ethical considerations and controversies. Its involvement in war crimes, atrocities, and the implementation of Nazi policies raises significant moral questions about the conduct of war and the responsibilities of military forces. The Wehrmacht's complicity in these actions remains a contentious and sensitive aspect of its legacy, prompting ongoing discussions about accountability and historical memory.
In the post-war period, the legacy of the Wehrmacht has been subject to reinterpretation and reevaluation. The process of denazification and the establishment of new military structures in Germany sought to address the legacy of the Wehrmacht and its association with the Nazi regime. The Bundeswehr, Germany's modern armed forces, was established with a focus on democratic principles and international cooperation, reflecting a departure from the Wehrmacht's militaristic and authoritarian legacy.
The legacy of the Wehrmacht serves as a reminder of the complexities and challenges of warfare, as well as the ethical considerations that accompany military power and decision-making. Its impact on military history, international relations, and historical memory continues to be relevant and important in understanding the broader implications of World War II.
After World War II, the Wehrmacht was officially disbanded as part of the Allied efforts to demilitarize and denazify Germany. The process of dismantling the Wehrmacht marked a significant turning point in German military history, as the country sought to rebuild and redefine its armed forces in the post-war period.
The dissolution of the Wehrmacht was accompanied by the prosecution of key military leaders for war crimes and crimes against humanity. The Nuremberg Trials, held from 1945 to 1946, sought to hold prominent figures accountable for their roles in the Nazi regime and the atrocities committed during the war. Several Wehrmacht officers were tried and convicted, highlighting the ethical and legal implications of their actions.
In the aftermath of the war, Germany underwent a process of denazification, aimed at removing Nazi influence from public life and institutions. This effort extended to the military, with the establishment of new armed forces based on democratic principles and international cooperation. The Bundeswehr, founded in 1955, became the modern German military, reflecting a commitment to peace, stability, and collaboration within the framework of NATO and the European Union.
The legacy of the Wehrmacht continued to influence post-war Germany, shaping discussions about military ethics, historical memory, and national identity. The process of coming to terms with the past, known as Vergangenheitsbewältigung, involved confronting the actions and responsibilities of the Wehrmacht and addressing the broader implications of its legacy.
Today, the Bundeswehr emphasizes transparency, accountability, and adherence to international law, reflecting a departure from the Wehrmacht's militaristic and authoritarian legacy. The transformation of Germany's armed forces serves as a testament to the country's commitment to learning from its history and promoting peace and security in the international community.
The Wehrmacht's legacy is marked by ethical considerations and controversies, particularly concerning its involvement in war crimes and atrocities during World War II. These issues continue to be the subject of analysis and debate, reflecting the complex and contentious nature of the Wehrmacht's history.
One of the most significant ethical controversies is the Wehrmacht's complicity in the implementation of Nazi policies, including the persecution and extermination of minority groups. While the Wehrmacht was primarily a military organization, its personnel were involved in actions that facilitated the Holocaust and other atrocities. The extent of the Wehrmacht's involvement in these crimes remains a contentious and sensitive issue, prompting ongoing discussions about accountability and historical memory.
Another ethical consideration is the conduct of the Wehrmacht during its military campaigns, particularly on the Eastern Front. The invasion of the Soviet Union and the subsequent occupation of territories were marked by widespread violence, brutality, and violations of international law. The Wehrmacht's actions in these regions raise important questions about the responsibilities of military forces in protecting civilian populations and adhering to ethical standards of warfare.
The ethical legacy of the Wehrmacht has been the focus of post-war discussions and efforts to confront Germany's past. The process of Vergangenheitsbewältigung, or coming to terms with the past, involves acknowledging and addressing the actions and responsibilities of the Wehrmacht and the broader implications of its legacy. This process has been central to Germany's efforts to promote transparency, accountability, and reconciliation in the post-war period.
The ethical considerations and controversies surrounding the Wehrmacht continue to be relevant in contemporary discussions about military ethics, historical memory, and international law. They serve as a reminder of the complexities and challenges of warfare, as well as the importance of upholding ethical standards and accountability in military operations.
The Wehrmacht was the unified armed forces of Nazi Germany, established in 1935 and comprising the Heer (army), Kriegsmarine (navy), and Luftwaffe (air force). It played a central role in Germany's military operations during World War II.
During World War II, Germany referred to its army as the "Wehrmacht," which encompassed its land, sea, and air forces. The term "Wehrmacht" translates to "defense force" in English.
Key figures in the Wehrmacht included Wilhelm Keitel, Erwin Rommel, Heinz Guderian, and Albert Kesselring, among others. These individuals held significant influence over the Wehrmacht's operations and strategies during World War II.
The Wehrmacht employed several key tactics, including blitzkrieg (lightning war), combined arms operations, and defensive strategies. These tactics emphasized speed, coordination, and flexibility in achieving strategic objectives.
The Wehrmacht faced numerous challenges, including logistical constraints, increasing resistance from Allied forces, strategic miscalculations, and internal leadership issues. These challenges contributed to its eventual defeat in World War II.
The legacy of the Wehrmacht is complex, encompassing its military achievements, ethical controversies, and contributions to military history. It remains a subject of analysis and debate, reflecting the enduring impact of its actions and decisions during World War II.
The Wehrmacht's role in World War II and its legacy continue to be subjects of significant historical inquiry and debate. Its contributions to military tactics, technological advancements, and strategic operations have left a lasting impact on modern warfare. However, the Wehrmacht's involvement in war crimes and ethical controversies raises important questions about accountability and the responsibilities of military forces.
Understanding the history and legacy of the Wehrmacht provides valuable insights into the complexities and challenges of warfare, as well as the broader implications of military power and decision-making. As we continue to study and reflect on this history, it is essential to uphold the principles of transparency, accountability, and ethical conduct in military operations. The lessons of the Wehrmacht serve as a reminder of the importance of learning from the past and striving for a more peaceful and just world.
For further reading and additional resources on the Wehrmacht and its role in World War II, visit the History Channel.